


A chronicle of wonderings and wanderings, commissioned May 2009.
Last month in India, we took our good friends John and Caleb out for dinner to refresh their memories of American food and culture. They stared at the Pizza Hut menus blankly and squirmed in the booth. Salads (including a Caesar salad with jalapenos and spicy cheese balls), soups, appetizers, pizzas, sandwiches, drinks, and desserts filled nearly ten pages with colorful photos and descriptions (it’s a swankier restaurant overseas).
Finally John spoke up, “Can you tell us what to get?”
“Whatever you want—it’s your choice.”
Silence. The guys looked at each other and then back at us.
“For six weeks we’ve eaten what’s been put in front of us, gone where people have taken us… we haven’t made decisions for ourselves in a long time. So… ‘constrain’ us, to use the Indian word.”
We laughed at them both and fiendishly enjoyed their struggle to choose every element of their meal: by themselves. “Constrain me” became the funny phrase of the week, whipped out for decisions great and small.
The structure of families, communities, and churches in India has a much more hierarchical pattern than American counterparts. India is the largest democracy in the world, but most decisions that affect daily life are made by the heads of smaller, more locally-based circles. Most parents still arrange marriages for their children. Within churches, the pastor directs his elders and laymen with clout we would associate more with employers and CEOs. John and Caleb, the only Americans serving in the ministry, had already experienced intimately a culture that respects and unquestioningly accepts what is handed down by the older and wiser.
As a well-educated American this system discomforts me, as I like to be a valued part of any decision-making process that, directly or indirectly, involves my life.
------------------
This odd phrase, “constrain me,” moved sharply to the front of my mind on Sunday when a pastor, visiting the Italian church, spoke on Acts 20:17-24. In the story, Paul tells his co-workers and friends in Ephesus: “And now, look, I’m going to Jerusalem, constrained by the Spirit, not knowing what will happen to me there… except that imprisonment and afflictions wait for me.” I somehow feel that it was natural for the apostle Paul to be constrained by the will of God, allowing his own colossal passion to be directed towards taking the gospel to all kinds of dangerous places. But I don’t think I know what it looks like or feels like to be constrained for I avoid it at all costs.
Being constrained doesn’t mean being confined; it means taking up someone else’s will and values so wholly that they replace your own and become your own. You accept what is placed before you, whether it’s a bowl of rice or a pizza or a doomed prison sentence with a quiet word of thanks, a blessing, to God.
For Paul it was the overwhelming, comforting presence constraining him that trumped the fear prompted by warnings of suffering and captivity. And here I am reminded that being steered by another is not the evil thing or the good. What matters is the will that is at the helm. We are all constrained, if not by someone else’s will then by our own.